Rail Travel News
News posting March 28, 2005

Index to recent news postings

2001 news archives

Photo gallery

Subscription info

Rail gift shop

Rail Travel News is a twice-monthly print publication, published since Dec 10, 1970.
Publisher: Message Media Company,
PO Box 9007,
Berkeley CA 94709.
Website copyright © 1997-2005 by Message Media Co.

Contact us
Site map

     Many more items have  been added at 
     RailGifts.com



New! Browse more railroad books

Modern Trains and Splendid Stations: Architecture, Design, and Rail Travel for the Twenty-First Century

   Several news sources have been saying in recent days that Amtrak seems likely to receive funding in the approximate amount of this past year, enough to survive on for another year without actually being able to make substantial progress on its backlog of equipment repairs.

   One of the nation's leading anti-passenger train individuals, Wendell Cox, told the press a few days ago that "Amtrak will probably get most everything they're asking for."

   As reported here earlier, the House of Representatives passed a budget resolution with $1.2 billion for Amtrak. 
While the Senate failed in a similar move, it was judged that supportive Senators were waiting for a more appropriate time to introduce Amtrak funding. 

   Amtrak Board chairman David M. Laney, a recent Bush appointee, may be aligning himself with president David Gunn's vision of Amtrak's near-term future, talking in supportive terms of the reforms and improvements Gunn has set in place during his term. 

   Amtrak supporters are hoping that the path Gunn is taking to Amtrak improvement will be seen by legislators as appropriate and worthy of further rail funding. What rail passenger advocates do not want is a shrinking of Amtrak to only isolated corridors in some heavily-populated areas. This concept has been around since the 1970s in the speeches and proposals of anti-passenger train sources. Amtrak supporters recognize it as a rather thinly disguised effort to kill off passenger trains entirely, since these corridors would need federal funding, and Congressional support for such funding would be rejected by legislators outside the corridor areas.

  Also on the supportive side are the numerous reports in the media recently concerning a coming oil crisis. In the past, these could have been written off by some as the products of environmental radicals, but now the warnings are issuing from established experts in petroleum analysis. They see a point at which demand outstrips world supply as coming as early as the present decade.

   In such a situation, it would seem illogical to give up rail as a passenger transportation mode, given its energy efficiency, safety and wide appeal. The nation already has experienced the massive turn to rail passenger service in the oil crises of the 1970s and the need for rail following the terrorist attacks of 2001.

   Last year Amtrak experienced its highest ridership count ever, of 25.1 million riders. The statements tossed out by chronic train-haters that no one rides Amtrak are seen as patently absurd by those actually familiar with the system.



REBUTTING SECRETARY MINETA
AMTRAK RUNNING TRAINS TO PLACES NOBODY WANTS TO GO TO?
A REPLY TO NORMAN MINETA
By Wes Roberts
AMTRAK BOARD LOOKS TO FY 2006
HOUSE VOTES FOR $1.2 BILLION FOR AMTRAK
  Amtrak Endpoint On Time Performance, Feb. 2005
ATTEMPT TO INCREASE AMTRAK BUDGET FAILS (March 17)
WHAT THE MEDIA ARE SAYING ABOUT AMTRAK FUNDING 
AMTRAK DEFINITION OF CHILDREN TRAVELING ALONE TO BE CHANGED
AMTRAK FUNDING: AN ANALYSIS
By Carl Fowler
Join or donate to the National Association of Railroad Passengers.
Donate to tsunami relief
Site map

Cover of forthcoming issue

Subscribe today!
For new subscribers
Renewing subscribers
To subscribe by US Mail
Request sample copy



   NEW! Browse train station posters
Click here